The Ultimate Reality of the Good God Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The Ultimate Reality of the Good God - Essay Example The Ultimate Reality of Good and Bad Taoism proposes that Yin Yang is the cosmic symbol of primordial unity and harmony and manifest phenomenal quality; the two great regulating forces of cosmic order in the unparalleled world. If Lao Tzu, the founder of Taoism, is correct in his notion as regards the coexistence of good and bad in one body to attain balance, God then is not wholly good, or rather God does not manifest balance. God is good can be understood as a twofold claim: â€Å"God is wholly good—there is no defect or blemish in God or in his actions for He never does anything which is ultimately wrong or evil, and God is necessarily good because He is utterly invulnerable to evil† (Morris 48). As each of us perceives good and evil differently, there can be no definite meaning to both. What one sees as good can be evil in the eyes of another, or what appears to be a bad inception can yield a good result. Nonetheless, man has the tendency to accept a thing as good only if it satisfies his desires. God at times relates to man in ways that cannot be deduced by an ordinary mind, yet His purpose is incontestably good however it affects man. God gives us opportunities to rejoice and grieve, to triumph and suffer defeat, to love and hate for reasons that do not often come out on the surface. As in the story of Job when he was sardonically urged by his wife to curse God for all the mishaps that b efell him, he retorted â€Å"Shall we accept good from God and not trouble?† (Job 2:10 NIV). ... As in the story of Job when he was sardonically urged by his wife to curse God for all the mishaps that befell him, he retorted â€Å"Shall we accept good from God and not trouble?† (Job 2:10 NIV). Good and bad are â€Å"at one and the same time a division and reunion, and if they are spoken of as contending forces, they are also co-operating powers and the tension in which they are held is that of harmony, of the mutual play of creation, not of conflict† (Cooper, Fitzgerald and Stoddart 20). Apart from the nature of God, this is also evident in the way children are reared. The intention of a mother is constantly disposed at what begets good for her offspring, thus will put into practice again the approaches that proved favourable on her first. Despite growing up under the same roof and direction though, children do not grow to be identical in character, nor in fate. Good and bad demonstrates balance in the art of healing. Patients suffering from the same illness may be prescribed different doses of medicine, or different types of medication, for that matter. While a certain remedy benefits one, does not create a firm basis that it will not harm the other. It is true that good and bad are in two distant poles; yet the poles are not separate but bent towards each other to form a connection; that without the combined perception of good and bad, there lies no success in an endeavour. Balancing Reality in Pursuit of Holism Author Brian Luke Seaward (146) states that balance does not necessarily mean a 50/50 ration with whatever sits on either side of the scale. Rather, it might be proportional to a 60/40, 30/70 split, or any combination that equals to a whole (146). The opposites which Taoists suppose as contents of a whole are but merely stages in

Federal Role in Healthcare Delivery Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Federal Role in Healthcare Delivery - Essay Example The role of federal government in healthcare is to facilitate Medicare- a plan by the U.S government to provide health insurance to people that are 65 years and above, those below 65 with certain disabilities and those with final-stage renal disease. On the other hand, there is Medicaid- a co-operation tasked with providing cash benefits to welfare beneficiaries, mainly low-income mothers and children and disabled persons and the elderly. This is a responsibility undertaken by both the federal and state government. Nonetheless, there has been a long-time argument as to whether the federal government should be responsible for healthcare entirely (Bovbjerg, Wiener and houseman, 2005). Those favoring the federal government taking over the healthcare system argue that healthcare is essentially a right and not privilege as illustrated by the state government system. That the federal government considers healthcare as a service entitled to all Americans because they are citizens as opposed to the fact that they reside in a particular state. Ideally, it would promote the general welfare of all Americans thus the Universal Healthcare plan. Those favoring the state government taking over argue that it would be better suited to comprehend its citizen’s problems and recommend viable solutions (Bovbjerg, Wiener and houseman, 2005). In 1945, President Harry Truman, only seven months into his presidency, proposed to improve the state of the healthcare system by tackling five issues. The foremost issue was the inadequate number of healthcare professional i.e. doctors, nurses and other specialists in the low-income parts of U.S. He noted that the low earning capacity of healthcare professionals in these parts made it difficult for them to practice there. Coupled with this was the fact that the hospitals and clinics present in these areas did not meet the proper standards of quality. Therefore, he sought to access federal funding to